Final Report
The WTEC expert panel's final report of its international assessment of rapid vaccine manufacturing is available for download in low-resolution PDF format. For a printed hard copy of the report, please contact WTEC.
Workshop: International Assessment of Research & Development in Rapid Vaccine Manufacturing
Our panel
of experts completed
an international assessment of
the foremost labs in Europe.
Their findings were presented at a final workshop held at the
National Science Foundation (Stafford II, Room 555) in Arlington,
Virginia,
on March 30, 2007.
Presentations from the final workshop (Europe).
This "baseline" initial workshop was held on January 23, 2006, NSF, Arlington, VA (Room 110, Stafford I)
The
threat of avian influenza to produce a pandemic among humans has
brought to the fore the pressing need for advances in rapidly
responsive vaccine development, manufacture and distribution.
According to a National Academy of Sciences Report, identification of a
viral strain may take as long as six to eight months with additional
months required to produce and distribute effective vaccine.
Standard methods for production of vaccine were developed more than 50
years ago. Many modern methods, materials, and processes can
enable improvement of the present situation.
The
solution to providing a rapid response with the production and
deployment of therapeutic immunization requires cross-cutting research
in manufacturing, biomedical engineering, systems modeling and other
disciplines, as well as quality standards, clinical testing and
education of responders and the general public.
The
WTEC assessment
will inform biomedical engineering, manufacturing engineering and
other related disciplines with respect to future research
initiatives that may help address bottlenecks in the R&D and
manufacturing chain necessary to address the problems of rapid
development and large-scale manufacturing and of distribution of new
vaccines. The results will provide guidance to R&D
program
managers worldwide, including those in the U.S. National Science
Foundation and National Institutes of Health, as well as other agencies
of the Department of Health and Human Services (e.g., FDA, CDC), the
Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense. The
information will also be provided to international organizations
concerned with public health.
Key
questions that will be directly addressed in this evaluation include
the following:
- What
is the status of international R&D on rapid vaccine
manufacturing and the development-deployment systems chain?
- How
do U.S.
activities in this area compare to those of other countries?
- What
ideas from overseas are worth exploring in U.S. R&D programs,
and vice versa?
- What
technologies will pay off, and what are the needs for government
promotion of general progress in vaccine manufacturing?
- What
opportunities exist for international collaboration?
Purpose
The goal of this study is
to gather information on the worldwide status and trends in vaccine
manufacturing R&D, and to
disseminate it to government decision makers and the research
community.
The study panelists will
gather information on research abroad, which will be useful to the U.S.
Government in its own programs. The
study will critically analyze and compare the research in the
United States with that being pursued in Japan, Europe, and
other selected countries.
This information will serve the following purposes:
- Identify good
ideas overseas worth exploring in U.S. R&D programs.
- Clarify research opportunities and
needs for promoting progress in the field.
- Identify specific opportunities
(persons and institutions) for international collaboration.
- Evaluate the position of foreign
research programs relative to those in the U.S.
The scope of the study, subject to modification by the sponsors, will
focus on the following important topics:
- Assessment of engineering R&D for flexible,
scalable,
modular vaccine manufacturing that could provide rapid response to the
needs of both the general public or to smaller regional outbreaks of
disease. Agricultural vaccine will be considered as well
because
of the demands for massive inoculation of domestic fowl and animals
from which applicable lessons may be learned.
- Assessment of vaccine production methods for optimum
compatibility with flexible, scalable manufacturing. Methods
of
separation, purification, quality control, etc. will be
reviewed. Which technologies can deliver the
desired
ability to rapidly scale and manufacture?
- Assessment of rapid evaluation of vaccine
effectiveness. What should be tested? What are
possible
useful surrogates and models for the population to receive
vaccination?
Other topics may be added to the study scope based on discussion among
expert panelists and the sponsors of the study. Some
additional topics to be considered could include the following:
- How can the technology response be matched to the
appearance
of the threat? A lot might be learned from various
countries’ responses to local disease threats, e.g., Russia
and
tick borne encephalitis disease. What is the interface
between
local and global vaccine/immunization programs? Rapid spread
of
disease could be addressed as another aspect of globalization.
- How might the deployment/delivery phase for vaccines be
improved? Issues of storage, shelf-life, stability, delivery
methods should be reviewed. How does the manufacturing
decision
effect the supply chain?
- Level of resources by government and industry for research
on vaccine production.
- Adequacy of existing and planned manufacturing facilities.
The following topics, subtopics, issues and themes have been
suggested
for coverage for coverage in the study.
- Experience of Federal research with
rotavirus
- Manufacturing processes with
scalability for large production
- Surge capabilities
- Manufacturing process for small
scale disease prevention
- Flexible manufacturing capabilities
- Storage and extending shelf life
- Production problems
- Adjuvants
- Fill and finish
- Intellectual property
- Manufacturers’ liability
problems
- Use of microfluidics
- Standards and measurement
capability: overcome in-process, in situ
measurement barriers
- Flow fermentation systems
- Protein manufacturing
- Health care modeling, primary
health care delivery mechanisms
- Realistic risk modeling and public
education
- Modeling of predictive toxicology
- Business modeling, public funding
and purchasing
- Vaccine distribution and delivery
methods
- Newer technologies: platforms,
recombinant systems, animal testing methods
- Nanoscale technologies
- Long term strategies for effective
research and development: road mapping
|
![[photo: Joseph Bielitzki]](pics/Bielitzki_J.jpg)
Joseph Bielitzki
(Panel Chair)
|
- Professor
Biomolecular Science
- University of Central Florida
- Inventure Holdings
- Vitae
|
|
![[photo: Stephen Drew]](pics/Drew_S.jpg)
Stephen W. Drew
|
- Science Partners LLC
126 Mountain Avenue,
Summit, New Jersey 0790l
|
|

Cyril
Gerard Gay
|
- National Program Leader, Animal Health
Animal Production and Protection
Agriculture Research Service
United States Department of Agriculture
5601 Sunnyside Avenue
Beltsville, MD 20705-5138
- Website: http://www.ars.usda.gov
|
|
![[photo: Terrance Leighton]](pics/Leighton_T.jpg)
Terrance
Leighton
|
|
|
![[photo: Sheldon Jacobson]](pics/Jacobson_S.jpg)
Sheldon Howard Jacobson
|
- Professor and Director, Simulation and
OptimizationLaboratory
Professor, Willett Faculty Scholar
Director, Simulation & Optimization Lab
- Department of Computer Science
University of Illinois
201 N. Goodwin Avenue (MC258)
Urbana, IL 61801-2302
- Research
Interests and Vitae
|
|
![[photo: Mary Ritchey]](pics/Ritchey_M.jpg)
Mary Ritchey
|
|