Agenda Draft version 15 Nov 04

Session: Each Scenario Session has been constructed to introduce science questions and provide the current state sensing to obtain data needed to gain insight into the scientific processes. One area of sensing technology is discussed, related to the scientific question, noting trends in that area of technology development. Finally, issues of deployment and maintenance are discussed.  

Duration of each Scenario Session: Each session is schedule for one hour. To encourage dialog, 15 minutes of each session should be reserved for discussion. Thus, in a session with three speakers (science, technology, deployment/maintenance), each speaker should limit remarks to 15 minutes.

Speakers: Each speaker should strive to give an overview of the area. For science, what are the compelling questions that need new types of sensors or new strategies for deployment to make breakthroughs?  What cannot be done now at all, or not effectively or efficiently? What is the societal impact of addressing successfully or ignoring the science? For enabling technology, what are the trends that in technologies, and what are potential cross-over technologies (applied in one area that might be relevant in others)?  For deployment, what are issues that need to be addressed for sustainable deployment of sensors? What can be gained by adopting a systems approach to deployment? Thus a session may be organized like:

Scenario 1: Oceans: TITLE – Jules Jaffe, SIO, Session Lead
Speaker 1: Science (and Societal Need) TITLE - speaker
Speaker 2: Technology TITLE - speaker
Speaker 3: Deployment/maintenance TITLE – speaker
Discussion

Note: Session Leads have the flexibility to restructure the sessions to better meet the goals of the meeting. For example, perhaps two speakers could cover these topics more efficiently.

Tuesday 30 November 2004


0830 -0900    Breakfast

0900 – 0930    Welcome: Host
Rationale for this workshop as seen from a NSF perspective: Alexandra Isern, Elizabeth Blood, Patrick Brezonik

Overview of Goals, Outcomes, Structure of Meeting: James Bonner (Texas A&M), David Fries (USF), Arthur Sanderson (RPI), Peter Arzberger (UCSD)

0930 – 1030    Scenario 1: Oceans: TITLE – Jules Jaffe, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Session Lead
Tim Cowles, Oregon State University (Science)
Jules S. Jaffe, SIO/UCSD (Technology)
Scott Gallagher, WHOI (Long term deployment)

1030 – 1045     Break

1045 – 1145    Scenario 2: Rivers to Estuaries and Coastal Waters: TITLE – Ken Reckhow, Duke University, Session Lead
Ken Reckhow, Duke (Science)
Hans W. Paerl, U NC (Enabling Technology)
William Shower, NCSU (Deployment Strategies)
        
1145 – 1200    Group Discussion: Commonalities

1200 – 1300    Lunch

1300 – 1400    Breakout Session 1
Science: David Fries and Peter Arzberger
Technologies: Art Sanderson
Systems Deployment: James Bonner
See below for specific questions to be addressed by each group

1400 – 1500    Scenario 3: Lakes: TITLE – Tim Kratz, North Temperate Lake LTER, U Wisconsin, Session Lead
Tim Kratz, North Temperate Lakes (Science and Needs)
Sally MacIntyre, UCSB (Science and Needs)
Rich Axler, U Minnesota (Deployment and Education)

1500 – 1530    Break

1530 – 1630    Scenario 4: Ground Water and SECURE Earth TITLE  - Russ Hertzog Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Session Lead
John Barich, Technical Liaison USEPA Region 10 (Science and Societal Need)
Ned Clayton, Petrophysicist Schlumberger Water Services (Technology)
Rick Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University/OGI (Deployment)


1630 – 1730    Scenario 5: Agriculture TITLE – Tom Harmon, University of California Merced, Session Lead
John Barich, Technical Liaison USEPA Region 10 (Science and Societal Need)
Ned Clayton, Petrophysicist Schlumberger Water Services (Technology)
Rick Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University/OGI (Deployment)

1730 – 1800    Discussion (common themes from Day 1)
Overview of Day 2

1800 – 1900    Mixing event

1900 – 2100    Dinner (whole group)

Wednesday 1 December 2004


1 December: “Mixing Events”. Breakout groups focused on key “cross-cutting” issues

0830 – 0900    Breakfast

0900 – 1000    Scenario 6: Terrestrial Ecosystems TITLE – Barbara Bond, Oregon State University, Session Lead
Barbara Bond, Oregon State University (Science)
Terri Fiez, Oregon State University (Technology)
TBD (Deployment)

1000 – 1100     Scenario 7: Air, Pollution in Urbana Settings TITLE – Joe Fernando Arizona State University, Session Chair
Joe Fernando, Arizona State University (Science)
Jim Cogan, Civ, ARL/CISD (Enabling Technologies)
Lenny Montenegro, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (Deployment)

1100 – 1130    Break

1130 – 1200    Interfaces TITLE – David Fries University of Southern Florida

1200 – 1230    Discussion
Synthesis of what we have heard
Goals for Breakouts (explicit products of groups)

1230 – 1530    Breakout Groups Session 2 (Work over lunch)
Science, Technologies, Systems Deployment
NEED: Chairs for each session
See below for specific questions to be addressed by each group

1530 – 1600    Break

1600 – 1700    Feedback from breakout groups   
[15 minutes per group – slides preferred]

1700 – 1730    Reflections and Unexpected Insights (who would be good to do this)
Overview of next day, Assignments

1800 – 1900    Mixing event Social

1900 – 2100    Dinner (separate)

Thursday 2 December 2004


2 December:    Synthesis (do we have more in common than we though)

0830 – 0900    Breakfast

0900 – 1100    Breakout Groups Session 3: Scenario Groups: Finalize Scenarios
Executive Summary Group
   
 1100 - 1130    Break

1130 – 1230    Feedback from groups

1230 – 1300    Final Discussion: Input for the Writers on Key points

1300                End for Participants (lunch available in food court within building)

1400 – 1800    Steering and Writing Committee Finalized First Draft.



Expectation on Scenario Session Chairs:

Breakout Groups Session 1: 

This is a preliminary session for Breakout Groups 2.  This Breakout Groups session falls along the themes of science and societal needs, enabling technologies, and deployment, will allow for the mixing of the science/societal need driven scenarios. The key goals of this preliminary session include

Breakout Groups Session 2: 

The breakout groups fall along the themes of science and societal needs, enabling technologies, and deployment, will allow for the mixing of the science/societal need driven scenarios. Some key questions that each group should answer include:

The issues addressed in these breakouts will feed directly into the report (see below).
NOTE: Each breakout group should have an individual who makes notes (powerpoints) as the group discusses the topics.

Breakout Group Session 3:

The purpose of this session is to complete a draft of each scenario, addressing the questions raised to the speakers, on:

Possible Outline of the Report (version 2)