Workshop: Sensors for Environmental Observatories
Agenda:
November 30 - December 2, 2004
Husky Union Building, Room 106B
The University of Washington, Seattle
Agenda Draft version 15 Nov 04
Session: Each Scenario Session has been constructed to introduce science questions and provide the current state sensing to obtain data needed to gain insight into the scientific processes. One area of sensing technology is discussed, related to the scientific question, noting trends in that area of technology development. Finally, issues of deployment and maintenance are discussed.
Duration of each Scenario Session: Each session is schedule for one hour. To encourage dialog, 15 minutes of each session should be reserved for discussion. Thus, in a session with three speakers (science, technology, deployment/maintenance), each speaker should limit remarks to 15 minutes.
Speakers: Each speaker should strive to give an overview of the area. For science, what are the compelling questions that need new types of sensors or new strategies for deployment to make breakthroughs? What cannot be done now at all, or not effectively or efficiently? What is the societal impact of addressing successfully or ignoring the science? For enabling technology, what are the trends that in technologies, and what are potential cross-over technologies (applied in one area that might be relevant in others)? For deployment, what are issues that need to be addressed for sustainable deployment of sensors? What can be gained by adopting a systems approach to deployment? Thus a session may be organized like:
Scenario 1: Oceans: TITLE – Jules Jaffe, SIO, Session Lead
Speaker 1: Science (and Societal Need)
TITLE - speaker
Speaker 2: Technology TITLE - speaker
Speaker 3: Deployment/maintenance TITLE – speaker
Discussion
Speaker 2: Technology TITLE - speaker
Speaker 3: Deployment/maintenance TITLE – speaker
Discussion
Note: Session Leads have the flexibility to restructure the sessions to better meet the goals of the meeting. For example, perhaps two speakers could cover these topics more efficiently.
Tuesday 30 November 2004
0830 -0900 Breakfast
0900 – 0930 Welcome: Host
Rationale for this workshop as seen
from a NSF perspective: Alexandra
Isern, Elizabeth Blood, Patrick Brezonik
Overview of Goals, Outcomes, Structure
of Meeting: James Bonner (Texas
A&M), David Fries (USF), Arthur Sanderson (RPI), Peter Arzberger
(UCSD)
0930 – 1030 Scenario 1: Oceans: TITLE – Jules Jaffe, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Session Lead
Tim Cowles, Oregon State University
(Science)
Jules S. Jaffe, SIO/UCSD (Technology)
Scott Gallagher, WHOI (Long term deployment)
Jules S. Jaffe, SIO/UCSD (Technology)
Scott Gallagher, WHOI (Long term deployment)
1030 – 1045 Break
1045 – 1145 Scenario 2: Rivers to Estuaries and Coastal Waters: TITLE – Ken Reckhow, Duke University, Session Lead
Ken Reckhow, Duke (Science)
Hans W. Paerl, U NC (Enabling Technology)
William Shower, NCSU (Deployment Strategies)
Hans W. Paerl, U NC (Enabling Technology)
William Shower, NCSU (Deployment Strategies)
1145 – 1200 Group Discussion: Commonalities
1200 – 1300 Lunch
1300 – 1400 Breakout Session 1
Science: David Fries and Peter
Arzberger
Technologies: Art Sanderson
Systems Deployment: James Bonner
See below for specific questions to be addressed by each group
Technologies: Art Sanderson
Systems Deployment: James Bonner
See below for specific questions to be addressed by each group
1400 – 1500 Scenario 3: Lakes: TITLE – Tim Kratz, North Temperate Lake LTER, U Wisconsin, Session Lead
Tim Kratz, North Temperate Lakes
(Science and Needs)
Sally MacIntyre, UCSB (Science and Needs)
Rich Axler, U Minnesota (Deployment and Education)
Sally MacIntyre, UCSB (Science and Needs)
Rich Axler, U Minnesota (Deployment and Education)
1500 – 1530 Break
1530 – 1630 Scenario 4: Ground Water and SECURE Earth TITLE - Russ Hertzog Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Session Lead
John Barich, Technical Liaison USEPA
Region 10 (Science and Societal Need)
Ned Clayton, Petrophysicist Schlumberger Water Services (Technology)
Rick Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University/OGI (Deployment)
Ned Clayton, Petrophysicist Schlumberger Water Services (Technology)
Rick Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University/OGI (Deployment)
1630 – 1730 Scenario 5: Agriculture TITLE – Tom Harmon, University of California Merced, Session Lead
John Barich, Technical Liaison USEPA
Region 10 (Science and Societal Need)
Ned Clayton, Petrophysicist Schlumberger Water Services (Technology)
Rick Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University/OGI (Deployment)
Ned Clayton, Petrophysicist Schlumberger Water Services (Technology)
Rick Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University/OGI (Deployment)
1730 – 1800 Discussion (common themes from Day 1)
Overview of Day 2
1800 – 1900 Mixing event
1900 – 2100 Dinner (whole group)
Wednesday 1 December 2004
1 December: “Mixing Events”. Breakout groups focused on key “cross-cutting” issues
0830 – 0900 Breakfast
0900 – 1000 Scenario 6: Terrestrial Ecosystems TITLE – Barbara Bond, Oregon State University, Session Lead
Barbara Bond, Oregon State University
(Science)
Terri Fiez, Oregon State University (Technology)
TBD (Deployment)
Terri Fiez, Oregon State University (Technology)
TBD (Deployment)
1000 – 1100 Scenario 7: Air, Pollution in Urbana Settings TITLE – Joe Fernando Arizona State University, Session Chair
Joe Fernando, Arizona State University
(Science)
Jim Cogan, Civ, ARL/CISD (Enabling Technologies)
Lenny Montenegro, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (Deployment)
Jim Cogan, Civ, ARL/CISD (Enabling Technologies)
Lenny Montenegro, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (Deployment)
1100 – 1130 Break
1130 – 1200 Interfaces TITLE – David Fries University of Southern Florida
1200 – 1230 Discussion
Synthesis of what we have heard
Goals for Breakouts (explicit products of groups)
Goals for Breakouts (explicit products of groups)
1230 – 1530 Breakout Groups Session 2 (Work over lunch)
Science, Technologies, Systems
Deployment
NEED: Chairs for each session
See below for specific questions to be addressed by each group
NEED: Chairs for each session
See below for specific questions to be addressed by each group
1530 – 1600 Break
1600 – 1700 Feedback from breakout groups
[15 minutes per group – slides
preferred]
1700 – 1730 Reflections and Unexpected Insights (who would be good to do this)
Overview of next day, Assignments
1800 – 1900 Mixing event Social
1900 – 2100 Dinner (separate)
Thursday 2 December 2004
2 December: Synthesis (do we have more in common than we though)
0830 – 0900 Breakfast
0900 – 1100 Breakout Groups Session 3: Scenario Groups: Finalize Scenarios
Executive Summary Group
1100 - 1130 Break
1130 – 1230 Feedback from groups
1230 – 1300 Final Discussion: Input for the Writers on Key points
1300 End for Participants (lunch available in food court within building)
1400 – 1800 Steering and Writing Committee Finalized First Draft.
Expectation on Scenario Session Chairs:
- Identify one or two other people to flesh out each session on science, enabling technology, deployment
- Ensure one paragraph for each layer, that is three for the session, is generated and provided to the organizers by Monday 21 November, to be placed on the web site (http://wtec.org/seo/). These paragraphs should address the questions raised above in the instruction to the speakers.
- Chair the session and keep people on time.
- Chair breakout/writing group on Thursday 2 December morning.
- Participate in writing group on Thursday afternoon.
- Review final draft.
Breakout Groups Session 1:
This is a preliminary session for Breakout Groups 2. This Breakout Groups session falls along the themes of science and societal needs, enabling technologies, and deployment, will allow for the mixing of the science/societal need driven scenarios. The key goals of this preliminary session include- Feedback from group on missing scenarios, technologies, and deployment issues.
- Initial Plan for structuring discussion on Day 2 in Breakout Groups Session 2.
- Preliminary homework.
Breakout Groups Session 2:
The breakout groups fall along the themes of science and societal needs, enabling technologies, and deployment, will allow for the mixing of the science/societal need driven scenarios. Some key questions that each group should answer include:- Science (David Fries, Peter Arzberger):
- What are successful strategies to bring together and nurture a multidisciplinary group of scientists, engineers, and researchers at different stages of their careers to focus on and produce solutions to challenges based on the driving science question?
- Identify several “interface” challenges (e.g. aquatic- terrestrial interface) for the next decade, identify sensor and deployment needs.
- What can NSF do to encourage team building to address these interface challenges?
- Enabling Technology (Arthur Sanderson):
- What are the new sensors that need to be developed? Possibly consider sensors by medium: air, land, water, biota.
- Are there demands for a similar sensor across multiple scenarios?
- What can NSF do to encourage greater migration of technologies across scenario boundaries?
- Deployment Strategies (James Bonner):
- What are issues in deploying sensors for long-term studies? What role does calibration and quality assurance play in deployment and maintenance?
- What are key strategies in developing and deploying sensors that can be shared across scenarios?
- Give examples of systems approach to deployment of sensors. A systems approach looks at the entire set of tools to gather the desired data by using a variety of approaches that reflect the reality of the environment.
- What can NSF or the community do communicate experiences on deployment or address the key issues of raised by this working group?
The issues addressed in these breakouts will feed directly into the report (see below).
NOTE: Each breakout group should have an individual who makes notes (powerpoints) as the group discusses the topics.
Breakout Group Session 3:
The purpose of this session is to complete a draft of each scenario, addressing the questions raised to the speakers, on:- Science,
- What are the compelling questions that need new types of sensors or new strategies for deployment to make breakthroughs?
- What cannot be done now at all, or not effectively or efficiently?
- What are the societal impact of addressing successfully or ignoring the science?
- Enabling technology,
- What are the trends that in technologies relevant to the science?
- What are potential cross-over technologies (applied in one area that might be relevant in others)?
- Deployment,
- What are issues that need to be addressed for sustainable deployment of sensors?
- What can be gained by adopting a systems approach to deployment?
- Interface
- What are the challenges of the future at interfaces of disciplines, and what sensors or systems are needed?
Possible Outline of the Report (version 2)
- Executive Summary
- Background and Rationale for meeting (this can be pre-written)
- Key Findings and / or Recommendations
- Scenarios: Driving Science (rough drafts can be pre-written)
- Technologies: Common Opportunities
- Deployment Issues: Shared Challenges
- Future: Community Building, Addressing Interfaces
- References (?)
