A unique responsibility of ISTEC is that it undertakes studies of the state of superconductivity research worldwide and makes projections of the growth of the industry. There is no equivalent U.S. organization. The closest is CSAC, but its membership represents only a small fraction of the U.S. industry. At the workshop on 10 April 1997, Mr. Toriihara presented some of ISTEC's findings. With his kind permission, some of his viewgraphs are presented in Figs. 9.5 to 9.8 and Tables 9.5 to 9.9.
Many of these figures are self explanatory, but some deserve special comment. For example, Figure 9.5 and Table 9.5 show that the companies involved in superconductivity R&D in Japan (not only SCE, but all areas of SC application) are predominantly medium to large companies, with over half having over 10,000 employees. This is in contrast to the United States, where SC has become largely the domain of small companies. Figure 9.6 is particularly disturbing, in that it shows U.S. budgets for SC, after dropping sharply with the termination of the supercollider, eroding further until they were exceeded by Japan in 1995. The funding levels in each country in 1995 are given in Table 9.7. The projections for 1997 and 1998 in the United States, if they could be included in this figure, would be even more gloomy. Figure 9.8 is a representation of Japan's "strategic plan" for superconducting applications of all types. Perhaps most interesting are Tables 9.8 and 9.9, which summarize ISTEC's comparisons of the strengths and weaknesses of SC activities in Japan with those in the United States and Europe. To a great extent, the ISTEC findings reinforce those of this panel, as discussed throughout this report.
Fig. 9.5. Japanese companies involved in SC, by industrial
category (ISTEC).
Table 9.5
Japanese Companies Involved in SC, by Annual Sales and Number of
Employees
Fig. 9.6. Japanese government budget for
superconductivity technology development compared to that of
the U.S. government, 1989-96 (ISTEC).
Fig. 9.7. Japanese Government budget for
superconductivity technology development: (above) 1996, and (below) growth
between 1988 and 1996 (ISTEC).
Fig. 9.8. Prospects for HTS research and development in Japan
(ISTEC).
Table 9.6
Superconductivity R&D in Japan, the United States, and Europe
|
Country or Region |
Total |
Federal Government |
|
USA |
200 |
|
|
JAPAN |
334 |
214 |
|
GERMANY |
118 |
70 |
|
FRANCE |
40 |
20 |
|
UK |
(25) |
|
|
EU |
(20- 30) |
|
Item |
Japan |
USA |
|
General |
Main projects are under the government's leadership. Most projects are operating on a large scale. Projects cover a limited field of study. |
Main projects are under the government's leadership Projects include large and small scale endeavors. Projects cover an extensive field of study. |
|
Project Period |
Long-term |
Middle and short- term |
|
Cooperation Research |
Not active |
Active; CRADAs between national laboratories, universities and enterprises |
|
Basic research |
Lacks support |
Continuous support available |
|
Application research |
Not very active |
Active |
|
Enterprises |
Mostly large enterprises |
Small to medium-sized enterprises are common. Venture enterprises are especially active. |
|
Promotion of small to medium-sized enterprises |
Not active |
Active |
|
Government funding |
Gradual increase |
Gradual decrease |
Table 9.9
Comparison of Strengths and Weaknesses of Superconductivity
Programs in Japan, the United States, and Europe
Source: ISTEC