The broad explorations of this WTEC study have shown a great diversity of impressive work on nanostructured materials. One could argue that many aspects of the work on nanostructured materials have been long-established efforts, with well-developed techniques that have been brought forth into the manufacturing arena. How do we then explain the current excitement and interest in nanostructured materials as a promising new endeavor? Part of the answer lies in the recognition of common scientific issues and common enabling technologies that link this group of researchers together. Ready availability of ever more sophisticated characterization methods that allow us to visualize and probe materials at the nanoscale has accelerated the pace of activities in this field; at the same time, recognition of the common critical issues of control over nanostructure size and placement motivates sharing of solutions over the boundaries of conventional disciplines. Thus, some of the most exciting findings of this study manifest the cross-fertilization of techniques and ideas; for example, aerosol particles are being integrated with more traditionally fabricated electronic nanostructures, with placement achieved through the manipulation of STM tips, in order to explore ideas of electronic device enhancement at the nanostructure level (Junno et al. 1998). A sample structure is shown in Figure 2.7. The ordered assembly of diblock copolymers define three-dimensional nanostructures, and those structures are transferred into electronic (semiconductor) substrates through high resolution pattern transfer processes (Möller 1998).
Recognizing the need for effective utilization of ideas across disciplines brings the responsibility of establishing the educational infrastructure that will adequately train young scientists to more fully develop the concepts and applications of nanostructured materials in the future. Such an infrastructure will require researchers and educators who are familiar with the properties of a broad range of materials, including polymers, biomolecular materials, metals, ceramics, and semiconductors. It will benefit from an informed perspective on critical applications, and must provide access to a wide range of synthesis and assembly techniques and characterization methods that currently reside separately in the disciplines of physics, chemistry, electrical engineering, biology, etc. Finally, a critical enabler for the future of this field and for its educational infrastructure is further development of computational tools that encompass the full range of atomistic calculations to macroscopic materials properties. This will require a "systems approach" (Olson 1997) that will span a variety of different computational models, addressing the different critical length scales, starting with solutions of the Schrodinger and Poisson equations, solving interatomic forces, and scaling all the way up to simulations of macroscopic properties and behavior (Goddard 1998).
Increased appreciation of and access to the diverse means of nanoparticle synthesis and assembly that have been developed within many different disciplines, and a common development of enabling tools and technologies, will enhance the pace of accomplishments in this new area of nanoscale synthesis and assembly.
Published: September 1999; WTEC Hyper-Librarian