NEFMAC, or New Fiber Composite Material for Reinforcing Concrete, is made from glass, aramid, or carbon fibers (or combinations of each) impregnated with an appropriate resin system, such as polyester, vinylester or epoxy to form a grid (Fig. 3.61). The method of production, shown in the schematic in Fig. 3.62, is a batch process. A series of continuous fibers are dispensed from individual creels by a mechanical system through a wet-bath to be deposited by two orthogonal traveling (winding) heads in a grid pattern. The heads move at synchronized speeds that define the size of the grid. Successive movement of the heads results in fiber cross-over and the placement of interlocking layers until the desired content/cross-sectional area is achieved. The process is capable of line speeds in excess of 2 m/min. with about 200 m2 of grid being produced per hour. Cure is achieved through the use of UV or radiant heat.

Fig. 3.61. Examples of NEFMAC grids.

Fig. 3.62. Schematic of the "Pin-Winding" process used in the production of NEFMAC.
Since NEFMAC is available in the form of a grid, it shows very good anchorage and mechanical interlock in concrete. Furthermore, due to its resistance to corrosion and excellent resistance to alkalis, acids and chemicals, it does not require substantial cover. Its light weight (specific gravity < 2) facilitates ease and speed in construction, without loss in performance. Although the most common form of NEFMAC is a grid, it is also available in a variety of shapes and forms (including a 3D reinforcement cage). Since it is fabricated using continuous non-metallic fibers, it is non-magnetic and can be used in areas where the use of conventional steel reinforcement would pose a problem. A variety of fibers (listed in Table 3.21) can be used as reinforcements in NEFMAC.
Fiber | Density g/cm3 | Texture g/1000 m | Fiber Diameter m | Tensile Strength kg/mm2 | Young's Modulus kg/mm2 | Elongation % | Remarks |
E-GLASS | 2.54 | ||||||
Monofilament | 350 | 7,400 | 4.8 | ||||
Roving | 2,220 | 22 | 200 | 7,400 | 2.8 | 2,300 filaments | |
T-GLASS | 2.49 | ||||||
Monofilament | 475 | 8,600 | 5.5 | ||||
Roving | 2,240 | ||||||
CARBON | |||||||
High Strength (HS) | 1.80 | 800 | 7 | 500 | 23,500 | 1.4 | TORAYCA T700; 12,000 filaments |
1.77 | 810 | 7 | 350 | 24,000 | 1.5 | BESFIGHT HTA; 12,000 filaments | |
1.79 | 800 | 7 | 360 | 24,000 | 1.5 | PYROFIL T-1; 10,000 filaments | |
High Modulus (HM) | 1.81 | 364 | 6.5 | 270 | 40,000 | 0.6 | TORAYCA M040; 6,000 filaments |
1.78 | 750 | 6.7 | 270 | 35,000 | 0.77 | BESFIGHT HM-35; 12,000 filaments | |
1.85 | 900 | 8 | 260 | 36,500 | 0.7 | PYROFIL M-1; 10,000 filaments | |
ARAMID | |||||||
Kevlar 49 | 1.45 | 1,267 | 11.9 | 280 | 13,000 | 2.4 | (11,400-denier roving) |
Technora (HM-50) | 1.39 | 167 | 12 | 310 | 7,100 | 4.4 | T-240; 1,500 denier |
STEEL | |||||||
SD-35 | 7.8 | >50 | 21,000 | >18 | JIS G3112 | ||
Stainless Steel | 7.83 | 176 | 20,300 | 2.0 |
The glass fiber types are predominant for use in non-structural or secondary structure applications. Carbon reinforcements are preferred for primary structure. This is due to aspects related to mechanical performance and long-term aging, such as creep and environmental durability.
Although polyesters, vinylesters and epoxies are all used, vinylesters are the preferred resin system due to their cost structure, processing ease and general performance characteristics. In grid form, the glass fiber reinforced NEFMAC has a specific gravity of 1.7. The carbon fiber variety has a specific gravity of 1.4. The nominal fiber volume fraction in all grids is about 40%. NEFMAC grid panels are available with grid spacings of 50, 100 and 150 mm, reinforced with glass [G], carbon [C], aramid [A], or hybrid glass-carbon [H] reinforcement fibers in a variety of configurations, as listed in Table 3.22.
Fiber Type | Bar No. | Cross- Sectional Area (mm2) | Maximum Load Capacity (tons) | Rigidity (tons) | Weight g/m |
G | G2 G3 G4 G6 G10 G13 G16 G19 G22 | 4.4 8.7 13.1 35.0 78.7 131.0 201.0 297.0 390.0 | 0.26 0.52 0.78 2.10 4.70 7.80 12.0 17.7 23.4 | 12.9 25.8 38.7 103.0 232.0 387.0 593.0 877.0 1160.0 | 7.5 15.0 22.0 60.0 130.0 222.0 342.0 510.0 670.0 |
C | C2 C3 C4 C6 C10 C13 C16 C19 C22 C25 C29 | 2.2 4.4 6.6 17.5 39.2 65.0 100.0 148.0 195.0 260.0 320.0 | 0.26 0.52 0.78 2.10 4.70 7.80 12.0 17.7 23.4 31.2 38.4 | 22 44 66 175 392 650 1000 1480 1950 2640 3250 | 3.2 6.3 9.5 25.0 56.0 92.0 142.0 210.0 277.0 369.0 454.0 |
A | A6 A10 A13 A16 A19 | 16.2 36.2 60.0 92.3 136.0 | 2.10 4.70 7.80 12.0 17.7 | 90 206 342 526 775 | 21.0 46.0 77.0 118.0 174.0 |
H | H6 H10 H13 H16 H19 H22 | 39.5 88.8 148.0 223.0 335.0 444.0 | 2.10 4.70 7.80 12.0 17.7 23.4 | 147 331 552 846 1250 1650 | 65 147 244 368 553 773 |

Fig. 3.63. Representative stress-strain response.
NEFMAC grids have been used in tunnels, runways and aprons for airstrips/tarmacs, roads, buildings, channels, rehabilitation, and for general architectural elements. They are often used as lightweight reinforcement in building fascia and curtain walls, where the lower requirements for cover applications result in thinner and lighter panels. The use of NEFMAC grids in the fabrication of such panels is shown in Fig. 3.64; the lightweight concrete building panels are shown being placed on a steel framed building in Fig. 3.65. Due to their non-magnetic properties, NEFMAC grids have been used as reinforcement in hospitals and in free-access floors, as well as in sensitive structures such as scientific laboratories and observatories (Fig. 3.66). In coastal areas and regions where rapid corrosion of steel reinforcement is a concern, NEFMAC elements can be used by themselves or in combination with heavier steel bars. For example, in the coal silo of the Daio-Paper Mill on Shikoku Island NEFMAC elements were used for the outermost reinforcing layer, which also served as a barrier for crack propagation (Fig. 3.67).

Fig. 3.64. Use of NEFMAC in the fabrication of a lightweight concrete curtain wall panel.

Fig. 3.65. Placement of NEFMAC reinforced curtain wall panels in a building frame.

Fig. 3.66. Use of NEFMAC as a reinforcement in the foundation of the Earth Magnetism Observatory.

Fig. 3.67. Use of NEFMAC as secondary reinforcement in a concrete silo structure in a coastal region.
The light weight, environmental resistance and ease of fabrication facilitated through the use of NEFMAC elements makes it an attractive reinforcing element for adverse conditions which could otherwise hamper construction. For example, at the South Pole the climate itself causes embrittlement of steel rods and makes rapid construction (including welding) difficult. NEFMAC panels were used extensively in the construction of the Showa Antarctic Base in 1991 as seen in Figs. 3.68-72. Not only was fabrication of foundations and walls easier because of the light weight and ease of placement, but there was also a greater assurance of quality and future performance without the severe degradation seen in conventional reinforcement. C10 and C16 varieties of NEFMAC (see Table 3.22) were used in the construction of floating foundation slabs, columns and column bases, walls and floors.

Fig. 3.68 . Schematic of the Administration Block Building for the Polar Base Facility.

Fig. 3.69. Use of NEFMAC in the foundation base.

Fig. 3.70. Use of NEFMAC 3D forms in the column.

Fig. 3.71. Use of NEFMAC grid as wall reinforcement.

Fig. 3.72. Use of NEFMAC as reinforcement in the floor.
Due to their excellent corrosion resistance, these grids, especially carbon fiber reinforced NEFMAC, have been used extensively in marine structures. Applications range from their use as reinforcement for fender plates and pier panels to their use as the primary reinforcement for concrete in a floating pier structure in Tokyo. In this latter example, 2,100 m2 of G2-50P NEFMAC grids were used as reinforcement in pontoons (built in 1989) as shown in Figs. 3.73-75.

Fig. 3.73. Schematic showing geometry of the pontoon.

Fig. 3.74. View of a single pontoon fabricated using NEFMAC grids as reinforcement.

Fig. 3.75. Overall view of the floating jetty.
Due to its non-corrosive nature, light weight, resistance to alkalis, water, oil, and sludge, and the capability of manufacturing grids to conform to a variety of shapes and contours, NEFMAC is often used as the reinforcement for shotcrete, both in repair and retrofit and for new linings and coverings. For this application, after the application of an appropriate but undisclosed safety factor, the G3 and G4 grades of NEFMAC with performance levels of 4,000 kg/m and 6,000 kg/m strength per width are more than equivalent to the strength levels shown by conventional welded wire fabric (2,513 to 5,890 kg/m). In this form of construction, a layer of shotcrete is first sprayed onto the surface to be covered. Then NEFMAC grids/elements are stapled to the shotcrete substrate using an air gun with compressed air loaded with staples 19 mm to 38 mm long and 16 mm wide between heads having a cross-section of 2.1 mm by 1.8 mm. Due to the light weight and ease of conformance, relatively few staples are needed. Then a thin covering coat of shotcrete is sprayed on. The use of thin layers of shotcrete, coupled with the ease in placement of the NEFMAC, dramatically increases worker productivity. Figure 3.76 shows the grid structure used for tunnel linings fabricated with this technique.

Fig. 3.76. NEFMAC grid for tunnel lining reinforcement.
Figures 3.77-78 show NEFMAC used as reinforcement for a shotcrete lining in an underground oil storage facility and the pilot tunnel leading to the facility. This facility is owned by Dengen Kaihatsu in Kagoshima Prefecture and uses G3 and G4 grades of NEFMAC. The overall cross-section is shown schematically in Fig. 3.79, which also indicates the use of rock bolts through the walls.

Fig. 3.77. Use of NEFMAC as lining reinforcement in an underground storage facility.

Fig. 3.78. Use of NEFMAC as lining reinforcement in the pilot tunnel (note the irregular face of rock).

Fig. 3.79. Schematic of cross-sectional configuration.
The shotcrete method also can be used for the rehabilitation and repair of tunnels using pre-stapled NEFMAC grids to form linings/walls (Fig. 3.80). The method also has been used for the fabrication of new tunnel linings for penstocks and tunnels for water supply in hydroelectric power plants (Figs. 3.81-82). Examples of the early use of this method (known as NATM) are given in Table 3.23.

Fig. 3.80. Use of NEFMAC in the repair/retrofit of a railway tunnel.

Fig. 3.81. Use of NEFMAC as reinforcement for the lining of tunnel walls in a hydroelectric plant.

Fig. 3.82. Use of NEFMAC as reinforcement in the floor of a tunnel used for transport of water.
The light weight of NEFMAC has also been used advantageously to prefabricate tunnel lining segments and provide reinforcement between segments during the repair of a tunnel on the Japan Railway Sobu Line (Figs. 3.83-85).
Period | Project | Use of NEFMAC | Location | Specifications and Dimensions of Grid Elements | Setting Area (m2) | Cumulative Total Setting Area (m2) |
May - June 1986 | Kumaushi Hydroelectric Power Plant | Reinforcing grids for shotcrete | Kumaushi (Hokkaido) | 1.3 m x 0.9 m, 100 mm Glass Fiber Glass Fiber + Carbon Fiber | 120 | 120 |
July 1986 | Kumaushi Hydroelectric Power Plant | Reinforcing grids for shotcrete of water-conveyance tunnel at hydroelectric power plant | 1.3 m x 0.9 m, 100 mm Glass Fiber Glass Fiber + Carbon Fiber | 30 | 150 | |
August 1986 | Kumaushi Hydroelectric Power Plant | Reinforcement for invert of water-conveyance tunnel | Kumaushi (Hokkaido) | 3.82 m x 0.96 m, 150 mm 3.82 m x 0.66 m, 150 mm Glass Fiber | 60 | 210 |
October 1986 | Kakkonda Hydroelectric Power Plant | Reinforcement for arch, side wall and invert of water-conveyance tunnel for crack prevention | Kakkonda (Iwate Prefecture) | Reinforcement for arch Diameter: 4.3 m, Depth 0.9 m Reinforcement for Side Wall: 0.9 m x 3.3 m Reinforcement for Invert: 0.7 m x 3.3 m, Glass Fiber | 220 | 430 |
November 1986 | Kumaushi Hydroelectric Power Plant | Reinforcing grids for shotcrete of tunnel-type water reservoir | (Shizuoka Prefecture) | 1.0 m x 3.0 m, 150 mm Glass Fiber | 70 | 500 |
February 1987 | Kumaushi Hydroelectric Power Plant | Reinforcement for arch of water-conveyance tunnel | Kumaushi (Hokkaido) | Reinforcement for arch: Diameter: 4.3 m Depth 3.2 m Reinforcement for Side Wall: 2.1 m x 3.2 m Grid Interval: 100 mm x 150 mm Glass Fiber | 160 | 660 |
February - March 1987 | Reinforcing grids for shotcrete of pilot tunnel | (Iwate Prefecture) | 3.05 m x 2.0 m, 150 mm Glass Fiber | 380 | 1040 | |
April 1987 | Reinforcing grids for shotcrete of advancing drift | Matsudai (Niigata Prefecture) | 2.0 m x 0.75 m, 150 mm Glass Fiber | 150 | 1190 | |
June 1987 | Kushikino Underground Petroleum Storage | Reinforcing grids for shotcrete of underground rock cavern for petroleum storage | Kushikino (Kagoshima Prefecture) | 2.0 m x 3.0 m, 150 mm Glass Fiber | 540 | 1730 |

Fig. 3.83. Placement of a prefabricated tunnel liner panel.

Fig. 3.84. Use of NEFMAC at joints between panels.
Besides its use in tunnels as part of a shotcrete or precast system, the grids have been applied to shotcrete for reinforcing dam slopes and embankments (Figs. 3.86-88), and walls of in-ground excavated storage tanks (Fig. 3.89).

Fig. 3.86. Application of NEFMAC for reinforcing the downstream slope of a dam.

Fig. 3.87. Application on a slope.

Fig. 3.88. Placement of shotcrete covering on NEFMAC used for slope reinforcement.

Fig. 3.89. Use of grid as reinforcement for the wall of an excavated storage tank.
2D and 3D grid elements also have been used as reinforcements in systems for slope protections and stability (Fig. 3.90-92).

Fig. 3.90. Placement of 3D grid reinforcement cages on a slope.

Fig. 3.91. Partially completed slope protection system using NEFMAC reinforced concrete.

Fig. 3.92. Completed slope protection system.
NEFMAC grids have recently been used in the repair and rehabilitation of concrete decks. In the case of the Tedorigawa Bridge (initially constructed as part of the expressway system in 1972), corrosion due to salt had severely degraded the concrete deck soffit. About 20,000 m2 of C3-50P (carbon fiber reinforcement with 50 mm grid spacing) grids were used in a polymer mortar for the rehabilitation. The grids were anchored to the original concrete using dowels with 60 mm heads, and were covered with a mortar for which they served as a base and reinforcement. In the case of the Niiborigawa bridge, the girders themselves were deteriorating. The lower 5 cm of each girder was chipped away and the reinforcement was exposed. NEFMAC grids (C3, C6 and C10) were placed on the exposed surfaces using dowels (Fig. 3.93-94) and precast concrete forms were placed on top. The area in between the NEFMAC grid and the concrete surface was then filled with polymer mortar through injection.

Fig. 3.93. NEFMAC grid attached to the bottom of the exposed beam.

Fig. 3.94. Rehabilitation of the Niiborigawa Bridge.
In another application, specially shaped NEFMAC elements were used as the reinforcement for the guideway on a prototype linear motor rail line on which speeds are expected to reach 500 km/hr. NEFMAC reinforcements were chosen because of their non-magnetic characteristics and ability to be molded for complex shapes. About 100,000 carbon fiber reinforced units consisting of grids and hoop reinforcement were used over a distance of 18 kilometers.
Similar to the NOMST (Novel Material Shield-Cuttable Tunnel Wall System) technology developed by Nippon Steel, NEFMAC can also be used to reinforce shaft walls, facilitating easier access through a shaft wall using a shield/bore, which can cut through the composite reinforcement without deterioration of bits in the rotary cutter. Not only does this application conserve resources, it also increases safety (previously a chip and brace method was used for the entrance) and speeds up the entire process without resorting to chemical grouting. A schematic of the process is shown in Fig. 3.95.

Fig. 3.95. Schematic of the reinforcing scheme for shaft walls.
In this kind of application, NEFMAC is generally in the form of a flat grid with spacing at 50, 100 and 150 mm. But a variety of curved panels are also available for specific geometries. Panels are primarily reinforced with carbon fiber using grades C10, C16, C22, C25, C29 (see Table 3.22) used in conventional applications of NEFMAC and special grades C32 and C35 (having sectional areas of 395 and 480 mm2, maximum load capacities of 47.4 and 57.6 tons, and weights of 561 and 682 g/m, respectively). Glass fiber reinforced grids are rarely used. But when they are, G10, G16 and G19 grades are the common choices. Figure 3.96 shows a large wall section fabricated from multiple grids, and Fig. 3.97 shows the placement in a caisson wall.

Fig. 3.96. Lifting of a multi-element wall section.

Fig. 3.97. Placement of NEFMAC "wall."
Figures 3.98 and 3.99 show the placement of reinforcing elements for shaft walls and depict double layers and connection details.

Fig. 3.98. Placement of NEFMAC in shaft walls.

Fig. 3.99. Reinforcement detail near head of tunnel showing double layers.
Connections between two or more layers of reinforcement use specially shaped "stirrup" and "plinth" reinforcements (Fig. 3.100).

Fig. 3.100. "Stirrup" and "Plinth" connectors.
An extensive list of NEFMAC applications since 1986 is given in Table 3.24. Sizes and types of grids are also detailed. Some applications in Table 3.24 (marked "*") have been listed by various sources as having either glass or carbon fiber reinforced grids. Although it is clear that a large number of the projects listed in Table 3.24 are actual applications, rather than test sites, it is not clear which of the listed sites were limited demonstrations, validation tests, or even included test articles. No data was available on the economics of the technology itself. Although a preponderance of applications appear to have used glass fibers as reinforcement prior to 1994, applications since then appear to strongly favor the use of carbon fiber. It may be coincidental that this was about the time when Shimizu concluded an extensive study on aging and durability of NEFMAC material.
No. | Structure and Location | Application | Specification and Dimensions | Date |
1 | Kamaushi Hydroelectric Plant Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. Hokkaido | Reinforcement in shotcreted tunnel linings | G4 - 100P - 0.9 m x 1.3 m H4 - 100P - 0.9 m x 1.3 m Total = 120 m2 | 5/86 - 6/86 |
2 | Manami Hydroelectric Plant Kansai Electric Power Co., Ltd. Gifu Prefecture | Reinforcement in shotcreted tunnel linings | G4 - 100P - 0.9 m x 1.3 m H4 - 100P - 0.9 m x 1.3 m Total = 30 m2 | 7/86 |
3 | Kamaushi Hydroelectric Plant Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. Hokkaido | Reinforcement in the invert tunnel | G19 - 150P - 3.8 m x G13 -150P - 1.0 m G19 - 150P - 3.8 m x G13 -150P - 0.7 m Total = 60 m2 | 8/86 |
4 | Kakkonda Hydroelectric Power Station Tohoku Electric Power Co., Ltd. Iwate Prefecture | Repair of channels Reinforcement in arches, side walls and inverts to prevent cracks | Arch: G10 - 100P - 0.9 m x 3.8 m - 1.05R Side Walls: G10 - 100P - 0.9 m x 3.3 m Invert: G10 - 100P - 0.7 m x 3.3 m Total = 220 m2 | 10/86 |
5 | Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. | Reinforcement for free access floor panels | G2 - 60P - 0.5 m x 0.5 m G3 - 30P - 0.5 m x 0.5 m Total = 157,090 m2 | 11/86 - 4/91 |
6 | Water Reservoir - Underground Numazu City, Shizuoka Prefecture | Reinforcement in shotcreted walls | G4 - 150P - 1.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 70 m2 | 11/86 |
7 | Pilot Tunnel for Underground Petroleum Storage Facility Kaihatsu Koji KK, Iwate Prefecture | Reinforcement in shotcreted walls | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 2.0 x 3.0 m Total = 380 m2 | 2/87 - 3/87 |
8 | Kamaushi Hydroelectric Plant Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. Hokkaido | Reinforcement in the arch and side walls for water conveyance tunnel | Arch: G13 - 150P - 3.2 m x G16 - 100P -2.9 m - 2.2R Side Walls: G13 - 150P - 3.2 m x G16 - 100P - 2.1 m Total = 160 m2 | 2/87 |
9 | Huthu Steam Power Station Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ltd. Chiba Prefecture | Reinforcement in the gate panel for cooling water stream, used for crack prevention | Reinforcement: C6 - 50P - 0.2 m x 0.2 m Crack Control: G13 - 200P - 2.2 m x 2.5 m G13 - 200P - 2.2 m x 0.2 m Total = 50 m2 | 4/87 |
10 | Daio Seishi KK Coal Silo of a Paper Mill, Iyomishima, Shikoku | Reinforcement of silo walls | G4 - 150P - 1.7 m x 3.0 m Total = 4700 m2 | 4/87 - 7/87 |
11 | Railroad Public Corp. Matsudai, Niigata Prefecture | Shotcrete reinforcement for lining used in expansion of the tunnel | G6 - 150P - 0.8 m x 2.0 m Total = 150 m2 | 4/87 |
12 | Okabe Doboku KK Kushiro, Hokkaido | Reinforcement for shotcrete used for protective layer of a retaining wall | G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 80 m2 | 8/87 |
13 | Iwata & Co., Ltd. (Iwata Shokai) | Grids in a purification/ digester facility | G2 - 34P - 1.1 m x 1.2 m G3 - 34P - 1.1 m x 1.2 m Total = 4570 m2 | 8/87 |
14 | Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. Negishi, Kanagawa Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete used on vertical walls of an underground LPG storage facility | G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 1.75 m x 2.0 m Total = 11,130 m2 | 12/87 - 3/88 |
15 | Asahi Glass Co. | Reinforcement in lids/ covers for gutters | G2 - 60P G2 - 50P x 150P G3 - 50P x 200P Total = 91,390 m2 | 12/87 |
16 | Oshima Earth Magnetism Observatory Tokyo University, Tokyo | Reinforcement for foundations | G10 - 100P Total = 300 m2 | 2/88 |
No. | Structure and Location | Application | Specification and Dimensions | Date |
17 | JR, East Japan Railway Corp. | Reinforcement for troughs, channels, etc. | G2 - 60P G2 - 50P x 150P G3 - 50P x 200P Total = 148,020 m2 | 3/88 |
18 | Tokyo Electric Power Co. Saiko Hydroelectric Power Station Yamanashi Prefecture | Surface reinforcement and reinforcement for shotcrete used on retaining walls | G2 - 50P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 270 m2 | 4/88 |
19 | Kushikino Underground Petroleum Storage Facility, Kushikino Kagoshima Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete used as lining of the underground rock cavern | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 500,200 m2 | 4/88 - 4/91 |
20 | Kushikino Underground Petroleum Storage Facility, Emergency Exit Tunnel | Reinforcement for shotcrete lining of tunnel | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 6,200 m2 | 5/88 - 8/88 |
21 | Kuji Underground Petroleum Storage Facility, Kuji, Iwate Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete lining of underground rock cavern | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 108,300 m2 | 6/88 - 9/90 |
22 | Nippon Silo, KK Chiba Prefecture | Reinforcement for fenders at piers | G19 - 175P - 4.2, x G19 - 200P - 2.3 m Total = 40 m2 | 11/88 |
23 | Kikuma Underground Petroleum Storage Facility Kikuma, Ehime Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete lining of underground rock cavern | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 146,000 m2 | 12/88 - 2/91 |
24 | Tokyo Electric Power Co. Utsonomiya, Tochigi Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete lining of tunnel for power transmission | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 1300 m2 | 12/88 |
25 | Seismological Research Institute University of Tokyo, Izu-Ohshima Tokyo | Non-magnetic reinforcement for foundations, beams and slabs | Foundation: G10 - 100P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Slab: G10 - 200P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Corners: G10 - 100P - 0.4 m x 0.7 m Total = 260 m2 | 2/89 |
26 | JR, West Japan Railway Co., Ayabe Kyoto Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete lining of tunnel during repair | G5 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 360 m2 | 2/89 |
27 | Alpha Technology Corp. | Reinforcement for water permeable sheets | G3 - 29P - 0.3 m x 0.3 m G4 - 29P - 0.3 m x 0.3 m Total = 850 m2 | 2/89 |
28 | Toyo Kosoku Tetsudo KK Kitanarashino, Chiba Prefecture | Reinforcement during width expansion of a tunnel | G2 - 50P - 1.1 m x 2.0 m Total = 2700 m2 | 2/89 |
29 | Floating Jetty, Tokyo City Government | Reinforcement panels for a floating jetty | G2 - 50P Total = 2100 m2 | 5/89 |
30 | Shimizu Chisho K.K. Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture | Reinforcement in curtain walls | H8 - 100P - 2.0 m x 3.2 m Total = 130 m2 | 5/89 |
31 | JR, East Japan Railway Co., Niigata Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete lining added during tunnel maintenance | G2 - 150P - 1.5 m x 2.0 m Total = 150 m2 | 7/89 |
32 | Geo-Magnetic Observatory of the Meteorological Agency Ibaraki Prefecture | Non-magnetic reinforcement for foundations | G10 - 200P - 1.6 m x 3.2 m Total = 20 m2 | 10/89 |
33 | Jumonji Doboku KK Chiba Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete used for tunnel width expansion | G2 - 50P - 1.1 m x 2.0 m Total = 220 m2 | 11/89 |
34 | Retaining Wall Hachiohji, Tokyo | Reinforcement for shotcrete layer on a retaining wall | G5 - 40P x 150P - 2.0 m x 3.3 m Total = 5710 m2 | 12/89 |
35 | Kikuma Underground LPG Facility, Mizushimu, Okayama Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete used in the service tunnel | G3 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 7200 m2 | 12/89 - 6/90 |
36 | Hokkaido Electric Power Co. Hokkaido | Reinforcement in lining of the Headrace Tunnel | G4 - 150P Total = 3000 m2 | 12/89 |
No. | Structure and Location | Application | Specification and Dimensions | Date |
37 | Kamioka Kogyo KK | Reinforcement for shotcreted walls | G2 - 100P - 1.5 m x 3.0 m Total = 90 m2 | 1/90 |
38 | Underground LPG Storage and Test Facility (Kajima & Taisei & Shimizu) | Reinforcement for shotcrete | G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 1680 m2 | 2/90 - 8/90 |
39 | Mine Cavern - Hokkaido | Rehabilitation through reinforcement of cavern walls using shotcrete | G2 - 50P - 2.0 m x 30.0 m Total = 840 m2 | 3/90 |
40 | Toyohane Kozan KK | Reinforcement for shotcrete | G2 - 50P - 2.0 m x 30.0 m Total = 3100 m2 | 3/90 |
41 | JR East Japan Railway Co. Tokyo | Reinforcement for shotcrete used in tunnel repair | G10 x G6 - 150P -x 80 - 1.58 m Total = 540 m2 | 3/90 |
42 | Joint Venture Project between Kajima Corp. & Kobayashi Metals, Ltd. | Reinforcement for shotcrete | G4 - 150P - 1.5 m x 2.0 m Total = 150 m2 | 5/90 |
43 | Teihyu KK Floating Pier Tokyo | Reinforcement in concrete used in floating piers | G2 - 50P - 2.0 m x 10.0 m Total = 1510 m2 | 5/90 |
44 | Kashiwazaki Nuclear Power Plant Tokyo Electric Power Co. Niigata Prefecture | Reinforcement in concrete slabs | G3 - 50P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 1260 m2 | 5/90 |
45 | Hokkaido Electric Power Station Hokkaido Power Co. Hokkaido | Reinforcement used in repair of tunnels | G4 - 150P - 1.1 m x 2.0 m Total = 120 m2 | 9/90 |
46 | Hokkaido Electric Power Station Hokkaido Power Co. Hokkaido | Reinforcement for tunnel used for transport of water | G4 - 150P - 1.1 m x 2.0 m G4 - 150P - 1.5 m x 2.0 m G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 0.89 m x 3.0 m Total = 2510 m2 | 9/90 - 12/90 |
47 | Akiba Hydroelectric Power Station Akiba III Plant Shizuoka Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete | G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 300 m2 | 10/90 |
48 | Hokkaido Power Co. Hokkaido | Reinforcement for repair of a tunnel | G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m G4 - 150P - 0.89 m x 3.0 m Total = 2390 m2 | 12/91 |
49 | Showa Administrative Building National Institute of Polar Research Antarctica | Reinforcement for walls, floors, columns, foundation | C10 - 100P - 1.4 m x 3.0 m * C6 x C14 - 100P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m C16 x C10 - 450P x 2.0 m Total = 970 m2 | 3/91 |
50 | JR East Japan Railway Co. | Non-magnetic reinforcement of railroad crossing pavement | G10 - 100P - 1.5 m x 1.9 m G10 - 100P - 1.0 m x 1.9 m Total = 80 m2 | 4/91 |
51 | Dengen Kaihatsu Kagoshima Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete in an underground storage facility | C10 & C16 grids Total = 1000 m2 | 4/91 |
52 | Shield Walls | Reinforcement for shaft walls where shields are used for horizontal tunnels | C13 - 150P - 1.3 m x 4.6 m * C16 - 150P x 300P - 2.2 m x 4.6 m Total = 50 m2 | 5/91 |
53 | Fukuda Gumi KK | Reinforcement for a tunnel in hot springs | G13 - 200P - 2.8 m x 5.4 m - 6.1R G13 - 200P - 2.8 m x 4.9 m - 6.1R G2 - 50P - 2.0 m x 10.0 m Total = 700 m2 | 5/91 |
54 | Water Purifier System | Reinforcement mesh (may be by itself, without concrete, application details are not clear) | G6 - 100P G10 - 100P G13 - 75P G2 - 50P Total = 1000 m2 | 5/91 |
No. | Structure and Location | Application | Specification and Dimensions | Time |
55 | Joint Venture Project between Shimizu Corp., Sumitomo Corp. and Tamehiro Kensetsu | Reinforcement in shotcrete used on the downstream surface of the dam | G4 - 100P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 23,160 m2 | 6/91 - 3/92 |
56 | Dengen Kaihatsu Ehime Prefecture | Shotcrete reinforcement in an underground oil storage facility | G3 - 150P G4 - 150P Total = 150,000 m2 | 6/91 |
57 | Dengen Kaihatsu Iwate Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete in an underground oil storage facility | G3 - 150P G4 - 150P Total = 110,000 m2 | 8/91 |
58 | Hokkaido Electric Power Co. Hokkaido | Reinforcement for walls of a conduit tunnel repair | G11 - 150P - 0.81 m x 3.1 m G11 - 150P - 1.75 m x 4.2 m Total = 890 m2 | 8/91 |
59 | Nippon Denso Co., Ltd. | Non-magnetic reinforcement for floors and moving shutter slabs | G19 - 100P - 1.2 m - 1.7 m x 4.0 m x 6.8 m Total = 230 m2 | 1/92 |
60 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Inc. | Reinforcement for floor slabs | G4 - 150P - 2.0 m x 3.0 m Total = 6800 m2 | 1/92 - 2/92 |
61 | Kyushu Electric Power Co. Inunaki Dam Fukuoka Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete used on downstream slope | G4 - 100P Total = 25,000 m2 | 6/92 |
62 | Hokkaido Electric Power Co. Hokkaido | Reinforcement in the Headrace Tunnel | G6 - 150P Total = 3000 m2 | 6/92 |
63 | Dengen Kaihatsu Okinawa Prefecture | Shotcrete reinforcement in the structure of a seawater based power pumping plant | G4 - 150P - 1.7 m x 2.0 m Total = 8000 m2 | 7/92 |
64 | Tokyo Gas Co. Kanagawa Prefecture | Reinforcement for shotcrete in an underground LPG tank | G4 - 150P Total = 29,000 m2 | 10/92 |
65 | Tokyo Electric Power Co. Chiba Prefecture | Reinforcement in shaft walls for shield operation | C9 - 100P Total = 200 m2 | |
66 | Yamanashi Linear Motor Test Track Railway Construction Corp. | Reinforcement for track | C10 - 100P Various shapes over an 18 km track | |
67 | Shinhorikawa Bridge Japan Highways Public Corp., Ishikawa Prefecture | Reinforcement for external repair of the bridge | C10, C6, C3 - 50P Total = 150 m2 | |
68 | Tedorigawa Bridge Japan Highways Public Corp., Ishikawa Prefecture | Reinforcement in polymer mortar added to soffit and girders for strengthening of the structural elements | C3 - 50P Total = 15,000 m2 |